Review: Tsotsi (2006)

31 05 2009

tsotsiTsotsi is truly a remarkable film.  It’s a story that’s rough around the edges with intense violence and poverty, yet having immense softness of heart.  Presley Chweneyagae (as Tsotsi) gives an amazing performance imbued with deep feeling saying far more with his face and eyes than perhaps even his words.  Credit is also due to the director (Gavin Hood) and cinematographer (Lance Gewer) for capturing in film both beautiful images and beautiful characters.  Thank you for taking your story seriously, for moving out of the way, and for letting your characters move into our hearts.  Thank you for shooting a hopeful ending.  Finally, a film that lives up to its tag line, “Hope set him free.”  Rarely have I seen a film capture as well the transformation from dark to light as does Tsotsi.  Bravo to everyone involved in this film, you have deservedly earned your Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film.  I highly recommend this film.





Review: L’Enfant (The Child) (2005)

30 05 2009

lenfantI was prepared to fully enjoy L’Enfant considering it won the coveted Cannes Palme d’Or in 2005.  Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t hate it, but it was just so typically European (which is not saying anything against our brothers and sisters across the pond).  I just can’t get past the extreme use of silence in European cinema . . . and L’Enfant uses so much silence that it’s unnerving (which would be good if this was a thriller, but it’s not).  I simply couldn’t put away the thought that the massive use of silence was a compensation for a thin script.  In my opinion, this would have been a better short film than a full length feature.





Review: Zwartboek (Black Book) (2006)

29 05 2009

black-book-zwartboek-poster-1I know a lot of people enjoy this film and I can understand why . . . action, intrigue, and the hero wins, but I just couldn’t shake my dislike for it.  Oh, the acting is fine enough and the set decoration is decent, but it felt like the film’s creators were forcing a crossbreeding of Raiders of the Lost Ark with Schindler’s List (And no, sadly, not the funny parts of Raiders).  It was as if they didn’t quite know how to balance “fun” with “serious” resulting in an end product that was neither hot nor cold.  Of course, this left me as the viewer feeling an overall sense of “blah” toward the film.  Perhaps it would have won me over a bit more if it worked harder to build intrigue and suspense vs. giving away the ending of the story at the beginning.  My recommendation: shelve Black Book and rent Schinder’s List instead (or, perhaps, The Hiding Place).





Review: Entre les Murs (The Class) (2008)

28 05 2009

2008_Entre_les_mursThe Class may, in fact, be the perfect movie to showcase my struggle with film as an art form.  Is film meant primarily to reflect reality as it is or display reality as it could become?  Is art meant to show us ourselves or the best version of ourselves?  I wonder if film, as a narrative art form, is meant to show us ourselves at the outset and throughout the course of its telling show us what we could become?  Truthfully, I’m not sure there is any one thing film is supposed to be . . . except perhaps entertaining.  And this brings us back to the film at hand.

The Class shows us the underbelly of a contemporary French classroom and, sadly, does very little else. The film’s characters don’t really grow, life plods on as normal, and by the end one wonders “what’s the point?”  Of course, that may be the point . . . that school is cyclic, students don’t really learn much, and teachers desperately need it to mean something, to someone (perhaps mostly themselves).  As a film, The Class falls neatly into art category #1 – reflecting reality as it is and providing few glimpses of what it could become.  As a viewer, I have to accept that this is the type of narrative the film’s creators have opted to tell.  What I don’t have to accept is that this particular narrative is entertaining.  And guess what?  It isn’t.  Not even close.  The best The Class can offer is a lesson in futility and that’s a lesson I’d gladly skip and recommend you do too.





Review: Love Actually (2003)

27 05 2009

Love Actually poster 3I have a suspicion that Love Actually is one of those films that grows on a person.   While I would give it three stars today, I wonder if I wouldn’t give it four tomorrow.  The acting is top notch (Emma Thompson, as always, is brilliant) and the dialogue is quite well written.  Now, certainly, I also think there are some problems in this film.  Too many characters, for starters.  Secondly, the filmmakers feel the need to tie the characters’ stories together and I’m not certain this is necessary to maintain a cohesive, compelling narrative.  Finally, the desire to bookend the film with the airport arrival gate scene just doesn’t work.  Not only does it not make sense as part of the story, some of the main characters don’t even appear in the scene.  It merely seemed like a mash-up to me; of course, if the lesson is that “love is a mash-up” then perhaps I can accept it . . . but it seemed like a deeper lesson was afoot here.  Still, the film has its sweet touches; and who knows, perhaps after another viewing I’ll come back to edit this review and give a more glowing report.





Review: Elephant (2003)

27 05 2009

424px-Elephant_movie_posterWhile the particular brand of shooting as found in Elephant is quite engaging and offers much promise when applied to the right story, I found the particular story at hand lost in the director’s gazing at himself.  I often find that a director is belly button exploring when the story gets lost in the shuffle of fancy tracking shots and pretentious insert shots of clouds. Considering the serious nature of this film’s subject matter, it’s a shame that Van Sant (who is also the writer) lost the story in the pursuance of proving his own directorial prowess.





Review: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008)

25 05 2009

untitledNot only does The Curious Case of Benjamin Button have a compelling story idea, it succeeds in telling it in a manner which allows the audience to focus on the characters and not the make-up or green-screening necessary to bring it off.  Sure, we can all agree that the film was in desperate need of an editor and could easily have been trimmed by 20 minutes. Still, the movie tries to ask some intriguing questions about mortality, the meaning of life, and the nature of love.  Does it succeed in really providing any new answers to these age old questions?  I’m not sure, but that’s a question best left to each viewer.  For me, I was surprised to find myself touched and thankful that no matter which way we age, deep relationships allow us to age well.





Review: Frozen River (2008)

24 05 2009

frozen_riverVery few will argue that Frozen River has a compelling story and interesting characters.  The thing that kept me “in” this film was the good hearts of the main characters . . . essentially, people stuck in unbelievably challenging situations making tough choices for the sake of family and a genuine concern for the welfare of others.

Beyond the story and acting, however, I agree with other critics who complain that something in the editing (or perhaps shooting) of the film was lacking.  True, I’m sure they didn’t have a monster budget to work with, but I don’t think that was the issue here.  While the gritty realities of poverty and brokenness that the characters are experiencing works well with the somewhat fuzzy, unkempt manner of the shooting/editing, I wonder if the film wouldn’t have had a stronger through-line if the director put more focus on the frozen river itself as a character.  The first frame of the movie is the frozen river and I wonder if it would have been a more cohesive film if it ended with the river (perhaps unfrozen?).  There were a few attempts to throw in an insert shot of the river here and there, but these often seemed out of place . . . like the creators felt like they were on to something, but didn’t quite know how to pull it off.  In the end, this is a minor criticism that may or may not have improved the film . . . perhaps, at most, a mere tweak to make a good film even better.





Review: Martian Child (2007)

23 05 2009

Martian-ChildI have always found watching John Cusack act akin to visiting my local Taco Bell . . . both offer bland rather uninspired fare.  For this reason I tend to avoid Cusack films all together, so it came as quite a surprise to me that I took a chance on Martian Child.  I admit that the premise of a needy, abandoned child who believes he’s from Mars did have a slight appeal (come on, we have all felt a little Martian at one point in our lives, right?).  I’m glad I didn’t pass this little film by. Yes, Joan Cusack is her annoying self and, yes, the entire film is a bit cliche and predictable, but it’s a nice predictable.  Good things happen in the end, broken lives start to mend, and love is found.  Come on, any film that delivers those kind of goods is worthy of 100 minutes of your time.  This really is an endearing film and the fact that it is loosely based on a true story makes it all the more satisfying.  Wow, I never thought I’d use “Cusack” and “satisfying” in the same review, but hey, even Taco Bell now offers a rather tasty grilled burrito.





Review: The Boy in the Striped Pajamas (2008)

22 05 2009

theboyinthestripedpajamas_galleryposterThe Boy in the Striped Pajamas may be the worst WWII/Holocaust movie I’ve ever seen.  The tag line for this film is: “Lines may divide us, but hope will unite us.”  Clearly, whoever wrote that sentiment never saw this film.  This is not a story of hope . . . not by a long shot.  As for being united, I saw no evidence of this within the protagonist’s family (the exact opposite, in fact). As for the boys themselves, they were united in the end but not out of hope or some other higher calling.  No, they were united by the sheer fact they were boys . . . young and naive.

And if it wasn’t bad enough to get a 90-minute long sermon about evil people getting their just dessert (aka: you will reap what you sow), I had to watch a film in English which clearly should have been in German.  From its tag line to its overly-preachy script to its sappy score and its concluding shot of the “pajamas,” this film is emotional pornography meant to arouse feelings for their own end and not for some higher purpose.   I recommend packing these striped pajamas away and renting Schindler’s List instead.





Review: Taken (2009)

21 05 2009

takenFor the same reason I enjoyed Eagle Eye, I took pleasure in Taken.  This action/adventure flick provides a little over 90 minutes of thrills, car chases, and Bourne-like hand-to-hand combat.  It will not change your life and the characters aren’t as fun as those in Eagle Eye, but it appeals to our innate human desire to see good conquer evil with a splash of vengeance, a dash of retribution, and a “happily ever after” ending.  The dialog is sparse, the screenplay follows all the appropriate foreshadowing rules, the acting is fair, and the cinematography fits the bill.  All-in-all, this film is a great escape and serves up quintessential Hollywood entertainment.  Enjoy the show.





Review: Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day (2008)

19 05 2009

miss_pettigrew_lives_for_a_day_movie_posterWill Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day change your life?  Certainly not, but I was charmed by this bubbly and delightful film.  Frances McDormand and Amy Adams are the perfect odd couple delivering spot-on banter certain to make you smile.  The film has a bit of An Ideal Husband feel about it, which certainly increases its appeal.  With great physical comedy and rapid-fire dialogue, this movie’s 92 minutes feels as smooth as a fruity Riesling on a sunny July day.  A great film if you’re looking to ratchet down your brain a notch and cruise into a relaxing weekend.  Enjoy!





Review: A Very Long Engagement (Un long dimanche de fiançailles) (2004)

18 05 2009

985876~A-Very-Long-Engagement-PostersAs a piece of visual art, A Very Long Engagement is as stunning as Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s earlier (and far better) Amelie. While this is unarguably a beautifully shot film with a wonderful early 20th century color palette, it all gets a little tiresome after two hours. I am certainly not the first film critique to make a connection between the title of this film and the fact that this is an interminably long film (a VERY long engagement indeed).

Beautiful cinematography aside, this film does seem a bit lost (is that the point, perhaps?).  The storyline is confusing and convoluted at best.  There were some plot turns that resulted in interesting visuals, but weren’t exactly necessary to support or advance the story.  I suppose, however, there is something to be said for little vignettes in life.  Truthfully, how often are our own stories told in a straight line resulting in a complete understanding of the events that have or are unfolding?

Still, a director must be conscious of one’s audience and do what he/she can to deliver an honest story with some semblance of a point (am I being too unrealistic about film here?).  The resolution of this film left me far from engaged.  In the end, I was ambivalent concerning whether the protagonists reunited and I doubt this is the particular emotion the film’s creators intended to produce.





Review: American Splendor (2003)

17 05 2009

american-splendorIn spite of the fact that I didn’t understand this film nor fully (or even partially) comprehend what the director was trying to accomplish in the telling of this particular story, I found something in this film that was strangely mesmerizing.  At first, I thought Giamatti’s brilliant performance must be the source of my bedazzlement, but the more I considered the film I grew convinced that my increasing attraction to it owed more to the character of Harvey Pekar and the freedom by which he lived his life.  I think we all long to journey from crib to grave being authentically ourselves, but due to cultural pressure, family realities, and circumstances too few of us live truly “free” lives.  Of course, I think there are often good reasons to “check” oneself, but there was something refreshing about seeing a life lived without regard to other’s opinions and judgments.  Where American Splendor fails as a linear story, it succeeds in telling a worthy story about human freedom.









Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.